ForHosting KIT · Translation

Transliterate

Transliteration is not translation, it is conversion between writing systems, turning a Cyrillic name into the Latin letters that represent how it sounds, not what it means. The Transliteration endpoint handles Cyrillic, Greek, Arabic and CJK scripts, built for the specific job of making names, addresses and identifiers usable in systems and searches built around the Latin alphabet.

● StablePer request + per 1,000 words$0.003
Use it from WebAPIEmailApp soonTelegram soon

Run this on our servers with your account. Free tools run in your browser; this one bills your KIT balance per the price above.

The distinct job transliteration does

A translated name is wrong in a way a transliterated name is not: a Russian surname does not have an English meaning to translate, it needs to become the Latin letters a passport officer, a shipping label or a Latin-alphabet database can read and sort correctly. The same holds for a Chinese company name entered into an international payment system or a Greek address that needs to sort alphabetically next to Latin-script addresses in one customer database. This endpoint exists for exactly that layer, below translation, where the goal is faithful sound and standard mapping, not meaning.

What happens to each script

Cyrillic text converts using established romanization conventions so a name renders consistently rather than however a given typist happened to guess it; Greek text follows the standard Latin mapping used in international contexts; Arabic script, written right to left and without short vowels marked in ordinary text, converts to a readable Latin approximation; and CJK text, Chinese, Japanese or Korean, converts using the standard romanization system appropriate to that language, Pinyin-style for Chinese, for instance. Submit the source text and the task returns the Latin-script version built to those conventions rather than an improvised phonetic guess.

Why standardized romanization exists at all

Formal romanization systems exist precisely because ad hoc transliteration produces inconsistent results, the same Arabic name spelled four different ways across four documents is a real, longstanding problem for anyone processing international records, visas, or shipping manifests. Librarians, cartographers and postal systems have needed consistent script conversion for as long as records have crossed script boundaries, and the conventions this endpoint follows descend from that same practical need, applied now to structured data at API scale.

Where it plugs into a data pipeline

A common pattern feeds a customer database, a shipping manifest, or an academic citation list through this endpoint in bulk, converting every non-Latin name or address field to a consistent Latin-script version for indexing, search or sorting, while keeping the original script stored alongside it. Because it runs asynchronously with results by signed webhook, teams processing large batches of records submit them in parallel rather than one field at a time.

The limits worth knowing

Transliteration is a mapping, not a judgment call about meaning, so it will not resolve ambiguity a native reader would catch, like distinguishing two people who share a transliterated spelling despite different source names. For anything where legal identity matters, like a passport-matching name field, treat the output as the standard starting point it is, and verify against the authoritative source document rather than assuming a single correct spelling exists across every system.

International customer database normalization

An e-commerce company transliterates customer names from Cyrillic and CJK scripts into a consistent Latin field for search and sorting, while retaining the original script for display.

Shipping and logistics manifests

A logistics provider converts Arabic-script addresses into Latin script so customs systems built around the Latin alphabet can process shipments without manual re-keying.

Academic and library cataloging

A research library transliterates Greek and Cyrillic author names into standard Latin romanization to keep its catalog consistently searchable alongside Latin-script entries.

Payment and identity verification systems

A fintech platform transliterates a Chinese company name into standard Pinyin romanization so it matches the format required by an international payment processor.

What is the difference between transliteration and translation?

Translation converts meaning between languages; transliteration converts writing systems, rendering how a word sounds in Latin letters without translating what it means.

Is the transliteration API free?

There's no free tier — free tiers get abused and slow everyone down. Access runs on a prepaid ForHosting KIT balance: top up from $10.00 (it never expires) and each request is charged at its published price, so a call with no balance returns HTTP 402. No subscription, no tokens, no invented credits, and a failed task is never charged.

Which scripts does it support?

It converts Cyrillic, Greek, Arabic and CJK script text, Chinese, Japanese and Korean, into Latin script, using the standard romanization conventions established for each.

Will two systems produce the same spelling for the same name?

The endpoint follows established, standard romanization conventions rather than improvised phonetics, which produces consistent results, though names transliterated ad hoc elsewhere may differ from the standard mapping.

Can I process a large batch of records at once?

Yes, submit many transliteration requests in parallel since each runs asynchronously with its own task_id, well suited to processing a database or manifest in bulk.

Is it accurate enough for passport or legal identity matching?

It applies the standard romanization convention, which is the right starting point, but any legal identity match should be verified against the authoritative source document rather than assumed correct without review.

How do I receive the result?

You get a task_id immediately since the job runs asynchronously; the Latin-script result is delivered by signed webhook, recommended for pipeline use, or a signed link valid for 24 hours.

Is my source data stored or used to train models?

No. Submitted text is processed only to produce your result and deleted after the retention period; it is never used for training.

Everything on this page is available programmatically. This section is for teams who want to wire it into their own systems; everyone else can just use the tool above.

POSThttps://api.kit.forhosting.com/translate/transliterate

Prefer to automate it? One authenticated POST creates the task; the result comes back by webhook or a signed link. The same capability also runs here on the web, and soon from our app, email and Telegram.

curl -X POST https://api.kit.forhosting.com/translate/transliterate \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $KIT_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"text":"…"}'
{
  "text": "…"
}
{
  "task_id": "tsk_a1b2c3d4e5f6a1b2c3d4e5f6",
  "type": "translate.transliterate",
  "status": "queued",
  "_links": {
    "result": "/tasks/tsk_…/result"
  }
}

The API is asynchronous: the call returns a task_id immediately and the result arrives by webhook. Polling is capped at 1 req/s per task.

Per request$0.003
Per 1,000 words$0.0135

Published price — no tokens, no invented credits. A failed task is never charged.

max_tokens20000
HTTPCodeMeaning
401unauthorizedMissing or invalid API key.
402insufficient_balanceYour balance doesn't cover the task price.
404unknown_typeThat task type doesn't exist.
429rate_limitedToo many requests. Use the webhook instead of polling.
422task_failedThe task failed after 3 retries. You are never charged for it.

Read the full KIT documentation →