Revised Geneva score
The revised Geneva score is a fully objective clinical prediction rule for the pretest probability of pulmonary embolism.
Run — free
Runs in your browser. Free, unlimited — your data never leaves this page.
Le Gal and colleagues published it so emergency teams could estimate PE likelihood from risk factors, heart rate, and symptoms without the one subjective Wells item that asks whether PE is the most likely diagnosis. Eight additive findings contribute integer points: age greater than sixty-five years, previous deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, surgery or fracture within one month, active malignancy, unilateral lower-limb pain, hemoptysis, heart-rate bands of seventy-five to ninety-four or ninety-five or more beats per minute, and pain on lower-limb deep venous palpation together with unilateral edema. The integer total maps to low, intermediate, or high probability of pulmonary embolism. This capability implements that published rule as a pure function: you send a positive heart rate, an age, and the six yes-or-no findings, and you receive each component together with the summed score and the probability category. A heart rate that is not a positive number is rejected with invalid input rather than being folded into an absolute value. The free browser widget and the prepaid API share one isomorphic module, so classroom answer keys, worksheets, and automation pipelines always agree. Successful API calls use the published $0.002 per item; invalid input is not billed.
How to use it
Enter your values in the form above. The tool checks them before calculating and shows the result on the same page.
Check your inputs
Use the labels and units shown next to each field. If something is missing or outside the allowed range, the page points to the field to fix.
Use it again or automate it
Use the browser tool for individual checks and the API when you need the same capability in an automated workflow.
What you can do with it
Get an answer now
Enter one set of values and see the result without building a spreadsheet or script.
Compare scenarios
Change one value at a time and rerun the calculation to understand what affects the result.
Automate repeated work
Use the API when the same calculation needs to run inside your product or workflow.
FAQ
How do I use this capability?
Complete the fields above and run it on this page. The form highlights anything that needs attention.
For developers — API access
Everything on this page is available programmatically. This section is for teams who want to wire it into their own systems; everyone else can just use the tool above.
API endpoint
Prefer to automate it? One authenticated POST creates the task; the result comes back by webhook or a signed link. The same capability also runs here on the web, by email and from Telegram — and soon from our app too.
Call it from your stack
curl -X POST https://api.kit.forhosting.com/health/revised-geneva-score \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $KIT_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"items":["valor-1","valor-2"]}'const res = await fetch("https://api.kit.forhosting.com/health/revised-geneva-score", {
method: "POST",
headers: {
"Authorization": `Bearer ${process.env.KIT_KEY}`,
"Content-Type": "application/json"
},
body: JSON.stringify({
"items": [
"valor-1",
"valor-2"
]
})
});
const { task_id } = await res.json();import os, requests
res = requests.post(
"https://api.kit.forhosting.com/health/revised-geneva-score",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['KIT_KEY']}"},
json={
"items": [
"valor-1",
"valor-2"
]
},
)
task_id = res.json()["task_id"]<?php
$res = file_get_contents("https://api.kit.forhosting.com/health/revised-geneva-score", false, stream_context_create([
"http" => [
"method" => "POST",
"header" => "Authorization: Bearer " . getenv("KIT_KEY") . "\r\nContent-Type: application/json",
"content" => '{"items":["valor-1","valor-2"]}',
],
]));
$task = json_decode($res, true);body := bytes.NewBufferString(`{"items":["valor-1","valor-2"]}`)
req, _ := http.NewRequest("POST", "https://api.kit.forhosting.com/health/revised-geneva-score", body)
req.Header.Set("Authorization", "Bearer "+os.Getenv("KIT_KEY"))
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
res, _ := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)Example request
{
"items": [
"valor-1",
"valor-2"
]
}Example response
{
"task_id": "tsk_a1b2c3d4e5f6a1b2c3d4e5f6",
"type": "health.revised_geneva_score",
"status": "queued",
"_links": {
"result": "/tasks/tsk_…/result"
}
}The API is asynchronous: the call returns a task_id immediately and the result arrives by webhook. Polling is capped at 1 req/s per task.
Pricing
Published price — no tokens, no invented credits. A failed task is never charged.
Errors
| HTTP | Code | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
401 | unauthorized | Missing or invalid API key. |
402 | insufficient_balance | Your balance doesn't cover the task price. |
404 | unknown_type | That task type doesn't exist. |
429 | rate_limited | Too many requests. Use the webhook instead of polling. |